![](https://i0.wp.com/finovate.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/pexels-markus-spiske-2990650.jpg?resize=640%2C427&ssl=1)
Social investing platform eToro announced this week that it is offering a new portfolio to give investors exposure to companies dealing with the challenge of extreme weather events. Environmental and social insights company Clarity AI recently announced that it is partnering with AWS to scale its sustainability insights platform.
While not as headline-grabbing as the AI craze, the speed with fintechs, banks, and financial services companies have embraced environmental sustainability may be one of the underrated stories of 2023. This is true for both “green financing” which supports the funding of climate-supporting initiatives as well as “green fintech” which involves the development of products that enable sustainable finance and eco-investing.
In 2023 alone, we have seen companies like ClimateTrade, Cloverly, Connect Earth, and GreenPortfolio demo their climate-conscious technologies on the Finovate stage. These companies shared innovations such as blockchain-based climate and carbon credit marketplaces, carbon tracking API technology, and climate impact scoring for investments. And before these companies were firms like Energy Shares in 2022 and ecolytiq in 2021 that introduced equity crowdfunding for utility-scale renewable energy projects and environmental impact data for payment transactions to Finovate audiences.
But are we making the most out of the current moment? A recent blog post by fintech observer and author Chris Skinner references a relevant column by James Vaccaro, Director of Corporate Strategy at Triodos Bank. Vaccaro took a critical look at present-day efforts by banks and other financial institutions to adopt more climate-friendly policies. His conclusion was that current efforts such as decarbonization are laudable, but often suffer from poor management.
Yes, there is some subterfuge and greenwashing going on, but many initiatives do have authentic intentions – they’re just not working optimally and need to be redesigned and upgraded.
Also, the recurrent phenomenon of there not being enough finance for green projects, but finance not having enough green projects to invest in, suggests that we’re not just dealing with a funding gap. There are systemic barriers at play and these need to be addressed with innovative solutions to unblock flows of finance.
Vaccaro notes that some solutions, such as carbon tracking calculators, have not turned out to be the killer sustainability apps that many hoped they would be. Nevertheless, he clearly sees a need for further investment in both green fintech and green-friendly finance – to use our previous taxonomy. He cites approvingly offerings like social impact bonds. He also is helping the Climate Safe Lending Network launch its Climate Finance Catalyst Contest to develop financial solutions to support the decarbonization of the financial industry.
Regulators are paying attention to the problem. In their report on environmentally sustainable finance, the International Money Fund, the World Bank, and the OECD “highlight(ed) the need for scaling up private finance to support the transition to net zero.” That aside, the report noted two, potentially related, challenges that are worth noting. These were the lack of frameworks and scoring methodologies (particularly in developing economies) and market fragmentation.
These issues are not new to financial services. And while there is much work to be done, these kinds of challenges are being effectively tackled in many areas of fintech and financial services – from payments to credit risk and lending. Often, as is the case with sustainable finance, enabling technologies such as blockchain, machine learning, and AI are driving factors enabling us to leverage data in new ways. This bodes well for the potential to make sustainable finance possible, and especially where it is needed most.